Present: Allyn Kostecki, Mary Kuzel, Joe Latimer, James Lindley,
William
Martin, Thomas Scherer,
Richard Shaw, Brad Strand, and
Bob Harrold, Chair.
Unable to attend: Laura de Haan and Richard Chenoweth
Minutes
1. The minutes of the September 8, 1999 meeting were accepted
after
minor modification.
Announcements
1. The Collaboration for Teaching and Learning Conference on "How
Learning Happens" will be held November 17-18, 1999.
(Brochure
circulated among committee members.)
2. Call for Proposals: "Sustaining Innovation" Conference,
February 17-18, 2000 Collaboration for Teaching
and Learning).
The deadline is September 27, 1999.
Brochure circulated among
committee members.)
3. Call for Proposals for the 105th Annual NCA Meeting being held
in
Chicago on April 1-4, 2000. (Brochure
circulated among
committee members.)
Reports:
1. The subcommittee to develop new assessment guidelines (de Haan,
Kuzel, Shaw) had no report at this time. Because
de Haan will be
on leave, Kuzel and Shaw plan to have a draft
of guidelines
available for discussion at the next meeting.
Unfinished Business
1. Bush Proposal:
a. Harrold noted that the Bush Foundation
has recommended
that the proposal to that
funding organization be approved
without modification. Upon
approval, activities could be
initiated next semester.
There was a discussion of placing
the proposal on the Assessment
Web page. This will be
discussed further by the
Bush Grant Steering Committee.
b. Martin discussed the Quantitative Assessment
Plan for
assessing courses in mathematics
and statistics (quantitative
reasoning). This assessment
would focus on what students
could do and would need
be tailored to fit each course
involving the application
of quantitative reasoning skills.
c. Shaw discussed assessment techniques that
could be used in
English and The Center for
Writers. This activity would begin
with assessment of the first-year
writing in ENGL 110 and
ENGL 111. He also
discussed utilizing "bridging courses"
in the sophomore year to
determine how well students are
prepared for writing assignments
and expectations during
their junior and senior
years. Each department would
determine expectations for
student writing in their courses.
New Business:
1. The "Adopt-A-Department" program was discussed along with
developing electronic and face-to-face linkages
with deans,
department chairs, and faculty.
2. Martin suggested that it would be productive to discuss
departmental Assessment Reports on a personal basis
with deans
and department chairs. Direct communication
with individual
departments to discus the new guidelines would be
desirable
as it would result in additional communication with
departments.
The meeting was adjourned at 4:45 p.m.
Recorder: Bonnie Erickson.
Assessment Minutes
|