Campus Space and Facilities Committee
Meinecke Board Room – Memorial
Friday, December 1, 2006 – 3:00 pm
Members Present: John Adams, Craig
Schnell, Emili Carlson, Verlin Hinsz, Amy Uthus, Joe Latimer, Tim Singelmann,
Kathleen Slobin, Cindy Urness, Dean Gross
Members Absent: Kim
Bromley, Marcelo Carena, David Rider
Ex-Officios Present: Bruce
Frantz, Ray Boyer
Others Present: Michael
Harwood, Gina Haugen
Chairperson,
John Adams, called the meeting to order. Joe Latimer moved and Amy Uthus
seconded that the minutes from the previous meeting be approved as written.
MAT Bus System
Mike Simonson,
MAT bus system, attended the meeting to address and answer questions dealing
with the bus and shuttle systems for the campus and the downtown campus buildings.
He indicated that he had not been aware of the problems with the current Route
13 bus staying on time. Therefore, the route’s logs were reviewed, and there
is, indeed, a problem. Although he stated that he was not making any excuses
for the problem, he told the committee that there had been a change in
management for driver services, so the new manager was unaware of the
importance of staying on top of scheduling. MAT held a meeting the previous
evening that was mandatory for drivers to attend. One of the items stressed was
that the runs cannot be early from this point on, and he apologized to the
university and the students, indicating that steps are being taken so that this
issue won’t occur again.
Bruce
Frantz stated that the routes have been on a reliable schedule and attributed
that to the program’s success.
He said
that he appreciated that Mike asked to attend the meeting in order to address
the issues. He asked the committee if they had any other questions concerning
MAT or the shuttle while Mike was there. Amy commented that she lives near one
of the stops, and she’s noticed that the bus sometimes doesn’t stop at all (and
she’s watched for eight-to-ten minutes before its scheduled arrival time.) This
is a problem because she could be doing something with her time other than watching
for the bus.
Joe stated
that the
Amy asked if
the downtown campus was a mandatory stop, and Mike indicated that it is. He
noted that he would address this fact with the drivers at their meeting so that
they are reminded that they are required to stop at the facility even if they
don’t see riders waiting, because riders may just be inside the building for
warmth or for security sake.
VP Adams
told the group that he recently moved here from UNC-Chapel Hill. The University
there has had a fare-free city transit for the past ten years that was paid with
federal, state, city, and a self-implemented student fee funding. The
University also charged a ten-cent campus wide fee per pay period for the
service. Mike replied that MAT had suggested a similar program for
In the
past, MAT met monthly with NDSU and its students to discuss issues as they
arose. Mike indicated that it got to a point where things were going so
smoothly that the committee decided not to meet monthly just for the sake of
meeting. He wondered if these meetings shouldn’t be resumed again. Bruce felt
that the meetings would be a good idea but that meeting either quarterly or at
the beginning of each new semester would be sufficient. This would give the
Student Government an opportunity to name a student representative to the
committee. Kathleen Slobin also felt
that a committee would be beneficial because the new downtown buildings may
present a different set of issues. Mike stated that he would work with Bruce to
arrange something similar to what MAT and NDSU had in the past.
DOWNTOWN CAMPUS PARKING
Amy indicated
that Mikes’s discussion answered many of her questions, but some remained
concerning the Downtown Campus (former
Bruce stated
that the City had already extended the time period for parking in that area in
order to be consistent and uniform with other areas of the city, so they may
not be willing to negotiate this matter. They have been very accommodating with
the University’s requests for downtown and don’t want to appear to be giving
NDSU preferential treatment. Amy pointed out that the students have brought a
lot of business to the downtown area so, perhaps, the business owners near the Downtown
Campus could be a little kinder to the students when it comes to parking
matters. Bruce also mentioned the POP program that departments are using to pay
for permits at a discounted rate for visiting speakers, guests, etc. at the
building. VP Adams asked Bruce to work
with Amy on developing something that the students could bring to the City
about their concerns.
PARKING & TICKETING PRACTICES ON
MAIN CAMPUS
Amy was
approached by a student who encountered some difficulties with parking on
campus. The student parked on the street nearest to the west entrance of the
Memorial Union because there were no spots in the MU
Kathleen
mentioned that the T2 parking lot was reconfigured when the Art Quonsets were
removed, making it difficult to back up or to park there. Bruce told the
committee when T2 was reconfigured, a small piece of
asphalt was put down to accommodate 16 additional parking spaces, making the
area very tight and not well laid out. The lot will be redone next summer,
along with two other lots, after spring commencement in May. The lots are all
high usage lots, so the work must be completed during the summer months.
CONDITION OF
Amy
inquired if there are plans in place to repair
OTHER BUSINESS
Michael
Harwood asked if new proposals for signage on campus should be routed through
the CSFC. VP Adams indicated that it should, so Student Affairs will present a
proposal for the
Kathleen
asked if the Memorial Union construction would be completed by fall 2007. She
had talked to Janna Mausolf-Stoskopf and suggested that it would be nice for
people to know where things would be located and what types of amenities would
be included after the renovation and addition were completed. The dissemination
of information could be accomplished through updated posters that provide the
status of the project, architectural drawings, etc. Bruce stated that they had
some colored renderings in the past and that, perhaps, they could be displayed
again. Kathleen inquired if the information could be found online and Bruce
indicated that it could, along with a webcam featuring the current site work.
Kathleen said that she’s had conversations with various faculty members who
indicated that they would like to hear/know about the various phases of the
projects, the new areas appearing in the
With no
further business, the meeting was adjourned at 3:50 p.m. The next meeting will be scheduled for the
first part of February with a second meeting being held before the end of the
spring semester.
Respectfully
submitted,
Gina Haugen
Gina
Haugen, Secretary