|
Proposal:
|
Grading Criteria
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
|
Reflects rhetorical choices
based on careful thought to audience, purpose, and situation
- develops a logic that
shows relation of each section to the next
- fills all generic
slots (situation, objectives, methods, qualification, costs, benefits)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shows attention to visual
choices that help make the document readable and aesthetically pleasing:
- headers, bulleted
lists
- chunked information,
adequate white space
- left justified, professional
design
- consistent choices
(clearly employs style sheet)
- consistent designno
mixed visual metaphors, artwork is appropriate
- charts and graphs
are appropriate, numbered, referred to in text, and captioned
- materials reflect
understanding of professional presentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employs "reader-centered"
readability guidelines:
- consistent point-of-view
(controlled shifts)
- lists in parallel
form, active verbs in parallel tense
- professional language,
clear, concise, repeatedly revised to sound intelligent and professional
- design helps readers
make way through complex info easily
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporates information
that reflects careful research on the topic
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shows careful attention
to proofing, editing
|
|
|
|
|
Back to assignment 2.2 |