|
Proposal:Grading
Criteria
|
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
|
Content:
- focuses on a central project and how it will be completed
- employs carefully constructed, convincing arguments
- demonstrates strong preliminary research
- develops a clear plan for undertaking the project
- fills all assignment slots
- includes a developed reading list
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shows attention to visual choices that help make the document readable
and aesthetically pleasing:
- headers, bulleted lists
- single-spaced, numbered pages
- chunked information, adequate white space
- left justified, professional design
- consistent design choices (fonts, spacing, capitalization, etc.)
- consistent designno mixed visual metaphors, artwork is
appropriate
- materials reflect understanding of professional presentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employs "reader-centered" readability guidelines:
- consistent point-of-view (controlled shifts)
- lists in parallel form, active verbs in parallel tense
- professional language, clear, concise, repeatedly revised to
sound intelligent and professional
- design helps readers make way through complex info easily
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shows adequate attention to:
- correct MLA format for citation
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
Back to proposal assignment
Back to 110 index
|