|
Annotated Bibliography:
|
Grading Criteria
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
|
Content:
- focuses on a central project (sources all "make sense" for the
project)
- develops summaries (75-125 words)
- develops evaluations
- accurate paraphrases, quotes short passages taken directly from
text
- provides concise evidence for evaluation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shows attention to visual choices that help make the document readable
and aesthetically pleasing:
- headers, bulleted lists
- single-spaced, numbered pages
- chunked information, adequate white space
- left justified, professional design
- consistent design choices (fonts, spacing, capitalization, etc.)
- consistent designno mixed visual metaphors, artwork is
appropriate
- materials reflect understanding of professional presentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression/Style:
- identifies the author's argument immediately.
- include all main points and any minor points given special emphasis.
- retains the logic and tone of the original argument.
- paragraph is cohesive
- avoids short, choppy sentences
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bibliography shows adequate attention to:
- proofing
- spell checking
- editing
- correct MLA format for citations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meets assignment:
- descriptive title
- each annotation appears in alphabetical order, by last name
of author
- number of annotations
|
|
|
|
|
Back to 110 index
Back to annotated bibliography
assignment
|