Art glass window by Marion Mahony Griffin
Making Rules/Breaking Rules
English 110 (Composition I)
Fall 2002
Assignments Syllabus Links/Readings/Handouts

Portfolio:

Daily in-class writing

Reading responses

Minute papers

Problems

Betsy Birmingham
320 J Minard Hall
W: 231-6587 H: 293-1065
Office hours: M,T, W, H, F 9-10, and other times by appointment


Description
This section of English Composition 110 is about understanding academic writing and research as rhetorical, rather than rule-bound, activities. We will look at how the writing "rules" we’ve all been taught function in our culture, what they are really meant to do, and how they can be appropriately and purposely broken in order to create the stronger, more rhetorically appropriate writing that will help earn you academic success as you progress through college.

Objectives
Specific, measurable outcomes: Students will:

  • show improved ability to read and accurately summarize academic prose.
  • demonstrate increased level of confidence in their own academic writing.
  • develop skills in organizing academic essays and research projects through forecasting information and employing transitions.
  • be able to write a short, focused academic essays incorporating one-two sources.


Learning goals:
Students will have the opportunity to:

  • analyze and effectively use secondary sources.
  • develop longer research, and/or multimedia projects of their own design.
  • begin to effectively edit and revise their own work.
  • work closely with other students developing the ability to collaborate meaningfully.
  • take charge of the quality and quantity of their own learning.

Texts
Online as assigned.
A handbook of your choice. We’ll discuss in class qualities you may want in a handbook. Purchase online, at Barnes & Noble, or at our bookstore.

Evaluation
Each paper assigned will include an assessment rubric so that you know what areas I will be grading you on. These are generally: content, organization, expression, and correctness. See sheet on evaluation for specifics.

Attendance

So much of the learning we do in this class is collaborative that you must be here. We are counting on you to be here, to be prepared for class, and to meet regularly with your group for your group projects. In small discussion sections, absenteeism is distracting and makes it hard for the class to develop the trust necessary for meaningful learning to take place. Because I will do all I can to make this course interesting and engaging, I am very unsympathetic to students who do not come to class. Each person has one personal day and one sick day per semester. After that, any missed classes will hurt your grade—I will be ruthless about this. Try not to be late—most important information about the class itself is conveyed in the first ten minutes of class.

Preparation
This course assumes a high level of preparation for college level reading, writing, and research. Although I want the classroom to provide a supportive atmosphere for all learners (me included), we will move through covering/summarizing material quickly and spend class time making connections among texts, synthesizing ideas, and discussing application of the reading material to our research and projects. Because this is a workshop class, the course will not work if you have not prepared by reading the assigned texts, writing your responses, and completing your assigned research tasks. The reading is challenging—and there is a lot of it. The projects require substantial research, and the writing tasks presuppose a process of drafting and revising. Here’s the hard part—you need to take responsibility for the quality and quantity of you own learning.

Due Dates/Revision
The due dates on your assignment sheets are for your protection, to help you balance your major work across the semester and receive feedback from me quickly (within a week) so that you can revise your work. Although you will not be penalized for late work, if you turn in work after the date it is due, I do not guarantee timely feedback; therefore, you may forfeit the opportunity to revise. As with all professional writing, I hope you will revise your work after input from colleagues, other professionals whose advice you seek, and me. Please turn in projects in class and not into my mailbox, or under my door, or anyplace else where they might be misplaced. You may revise any written work—with the exception of problems, tests, or in-class assignments—at any time throughout the semester. Your grade on the revised work will be the grade you receive for that assignment (no averaging, etc.), so I encourage you to revise! But make sure you revise and don’t just edit if you want an improved grade.

Plagiarism
The work you turn in must be yours/your group’s, must respect the intellectual property rights of others, and must cite secondary sources. This policy is consistent with NDSU University Senate policy, Section 335: Code of Academic Responsibility and Conduct. For more details see: http://www.ndsu.nodak.edu/policy/335.htm.

Special Needs

If you have any disabilities or special needs, or need special accommodations in this course, please share your concerns or requests with me as soon as possible.

Calendar

Daily calendar/readings

Links to handouts

Evaluation Criteria

Reviewing your papers

Editing your papers

Proofing for spelling

Writing concisely

Transitions

1. Proposal 10%

Assignment

Grading Rubric

Sample Proposal

Sample (from an upper level class)

2. Search Assignment 10%

Assignment

Grading Rubric

Sample Bibliography

PBL (Problem-based Learning)
(Some information about teaching practices.)

Basics

Outside sources

3. Annotated Bib 15%

Assignment

Grading Rubric

Sample Summative Bibliography

Sample annotation

Documentation
MLA

Electronic Sources—Columbia Guide to On-line Style

More Electronic Sources—Berkeley

Basics of Documentation


"Beyond the MLA Handbook"

4. Draft 1 15%

Assignment

Grading Rubric

Sample Assignment

Writing Advice

Common Problems with Essays + Advice

Dan Kurland's critical reading

5. Redraft 10%

Assignment

Grading Rubric

Sample assignment

Sample assignment
(Movie plays best on campus or ether net connection, viewed in Internet Explorer)

Contacting Classmates
A list of e-mail addresses

On-campus help:

Super Tutor

Center for Writers

In-class problems/activities

Choosing a handbook

Design a style sheet for citing sources

Organizing projects (design a project organizer)

Develop a peer review rubric

Revision problem

Editing Problem

Plagiarism Problem

Useful Links:

Evaluating online sources

Scholarly journal vs. popular magazines

Power Searching for Anyone

Search Engine Math

Search Engine Tutorial

Writing Summaries

Summaries: An Introduction


Critical Reading Towards Critical Writing

Analytical Reading

Quiz topics:

Syllabus

Web site

Searching for sources

Why we cite sources

What is plagiarism

Summarizing a text

Any handouts or readings

Pre/Post Tests

Writing Apprehension Test

Pretest A
Rubric

Pretest B
Rubric

Post Test A
Rubric

Post Test B
Rubric

Back to index

Elizabeth Birmingham
Assistant Professor, Department of English
320J Minard Hall
North Dakota State University
Fargo, North Dakota 58105

Office: (701) 231-6587
e-mail: Elizabeth.Birmingham@ndsu.nodak.edu

Prospective students may schedule a visit by calling: 1-800-488-NDSU.

North Dakota State University logo; reads N.D.S.U.