![]() |
|
|
|||
|
North Dakota State University
Division I Executive Summary February 6, 2002
A. INTRODUCTION
North Dakota State University President Joseph A. Chapman has challenged all campus units to define a "next level of excellence" and to submit proposals to reach those goals. This challenge has resulted in a growing array of academic programs, an expanded research portfolio, and increased graduate and undergraduate enrollment. The assumption behind the challenge is that a university that looks more like its national land-grant university peers will better serve the citizens of the region. In defining its next level of excellence, the NDSU Intercollegiate Athletics program is considering a possible divisional reclassification from NCAA Division II to Division I-AA. In October 2001, North Dakota State University (NDSU) retained Carr Sports Associates, Inc. (CSA) to conduct a feasibility study to evaluate the current status and potential reclassification of its Intercollegiate Athletics Program from NCAA Division II to Division I-AA. Within the context of that charge, the Consultants were asked to provide recommendations to reclassify to I-AA or to remain in Division II. The process included on campus interviews with various NDSU stakeholders as well as reviewing University, North Central Conference, selected Division II and Division I institutions and NCAA materials. The NDSU Division I Leadership Team, representing various University constituencies, provided additional focus from an Institutional perspective. The Consultants also solicited input from coaches, Athletic Department and University staff. This Study, Considerations for Division I Athletics at North Dakota State University, was presented to NDSU in January 2002. Members of the Carr Sports Associates, Inc. team returned to the NDSU campus on January 23, 2002 to make a formal presentation of the Study. The Study is presented in the following sections.
Unless otherwise indicated all financial projections for NDSU are shown in FY 2001-2002 dollars including some adjustments for inflation in future years. Composite figures for NCAA II and I-AA members were generally obtained from the most recent documents or surveys available. B. OBSERVATIONS AND COMMENTS Using the Study outline as a guide, the following Observations and Comments summarize the most salient internal and external issues influencing NDSU's considerations for reclassifying Athletics from NCAA Division II to I-AA. The Consultants' Conclusions and Recommendations are provided and the end of this Executive Summary.
Policy Issues NDSU is to be commended for developing an institutional strategic plan, which identifies Mission, Core Values, Vision, and Major Themes that touch every aspect of the University's internal function and its outreach. The Consultants recommend that NDSU's Athletic Program develop a related strategic plan for its direction and operation. The Consultants further recommend that NDSU give primary consideration to the total institution's best interests (not simply those of athletics) regarding NCAA classification.
NCAA Legislation Involving Division I-AA Membership Assuming an intent to apply occurred during academic year 2002-03, the institution's first year of reclassification would be 2003-04. During that year, the institution must compete in a minimum number of contests against four-year institutions, utilizing a minimum number of participants. The institution currently would meet those participant and contest requirements. However, during the second year of reclassification (2004-05), the institution must be in compliance with all other Division I legislation. This would include scheduling 100 percent of its contests against Division I institutions in those sports the University utilizes to meet Division I sports sponsorship requirements. This would be a significant challenge for the institution. The institution currently would not meet any of the three options under the Division I-AA financial aid requirements, in that it does not award a sufficient total amount of aid to student-athletes. Without regard to Title IX compliance and depending upon the sport(s), the institution would need to add at least six additional equivalencies to meet the option that appears to be the easiest for the institution to meet.
NCAA Legislation Pertaining to Conferences Once the institution declares its intent to reclassify from Division II to Division I, it would be eligible for NCAA championships in Division I as an at-large team in five years in all sports. It would be eligible as an automatic qualifier from an existing conference in 7 years in sports other than men's basketball; men's basketball requires 13 years. The Consultants believe that the above proposed automatic qualification legislation concerning men's basketball is excessive and it is reasonable to expect some reduction in the number of years. NDSU must be prepared to wait 5 years to be eligible for a Division I Championship for all sports other than men's basketball; automatic qualification will require additional years.
Implementation Issues NCAA reclassification to Division I-AA will require a five-year period during which NDSU's teams will not be eligible for NCAA Championships. This will challenge the institution in the key areas of recruiting and retaining quality student-athletes and coaches as well as support from constituents. If NDSU decides to move quickly, the timeline for implementation could begin as soon as 2002-2003. Scheduling the correct number of athletic contests against Division I opponents is a requirement for Division I-AA membership; conference membership facilitates meeting those standards. The limited number and distribution of Division I institutions in NDSU's geographic region further complicates this matter. For example, neither North Dakota nor South Dakota has any Division I schools and Minnesota has only one; those same states total sixteen schools in Division II. The Consultants conclude that the most difficult aspect of making the decision to reclassify to Division I-AA is establishing an athletic conference relationship with respected peer institutions located within a reasonable distance of each other. Therefore, NDSU should immediately begin to assess its options for conference membership. Possible options should be in place before making the decision to reclassify to I-AA. The Consultants further conclude that since the impact of the NCAA period of reclassification is the next most significant issue of a move to Division I-AA, NDSU must gain support now from its staff, student-athletes and constituents for the long-term benefits of the move to Division I-AA.
Title IX Compliance Division I has specific minimum amounts of athletic financial assistance that must be met and maintained as a criterion for membership. NDSU is currently in compliance with Title IX as it pertains to athletic financial assistance. However, if the institution elected to maximize the number of football scholarships allowed for Division I-AA football, a comparable number of women's scholarships will have to be added. Most of the remaining 11 Title IX program components were equivalent. Recommendations include adding one assistant coach and renovating two locker rooms in the Bentson Bunker Fieldhouse. The other areas will require substantial increases in budget if the move to Division I is realized, particularly in travel.
Fiscal Issues The NDSU Athletic Budget will need to increase to compare with the average Division I-AA or Big Sky Conference program. NDSU's current budget of $5,124,388 is 6.5% or nearly $356,000 less than the average Division I-AA program and 18.7% or $1.18 million less than the average Big Sky Conference program's total expense budget. As the pro forma developed for this Study indicates, a decision to reclassify to I-AA would require a sizable increase in scholarship spending. Simply, a strategic plan for additional athletic scholarships over the five-year transition period would be critical to the financial and competitive success of the Bison sports teams.
External Revenue Issues By Division II and I-AA standards NDSU's Athletic fundraising programs are quite mature. Divided into Annual Giving (Team Makers) and Major Gifts (Development) these two units are projected to contribute 20% of the Athletics total revenue in FY 2002. A continuation of this heavy reliance on external donor support will require some redesign of each fundraising area, regardless of NCAA classification. First, annual giving levels have remained constant since 1992 and should be examined and restructured to maximize revenue and ensure equity. Second, annual donor activities should be expanded regionally and further formalized while taking full advantage of resources offered through the Alumni Association and NDSU's agri-business outreach. Third, noticeably absent during the Consultants' analysis was a formal case statement and "Moves Management" process for Major Gifts activities. The upcoming University capital campaign further necessitates the prioritization and strict presentation of Athletics Major Gifts needs. Prior to reclassifying to I-AA, Marketing and Promotions as well as the other External Operations units (Development/Advancement, Ticket Operations and Sports Information) develop and implement respective comprehensive business plans. Moreover, these plans should synergistically support the Athletic Department's overall revenue, customer service and public relations goals. NDSU's broadcast rights agreement provides NDSU Athletics with sizeable revenue and an array of radio, television and other exposure opportunities. This exposure also positively affects the University's ability to attract students, connect with constituents and generally promote NDSU. Regardless of NDSU's NCAA classification, it should strive to continue and enhance its broadcast agreement. NDSU's average ticket sales (gate receipts) revenue also outpaces the averages for both Division II and I-AA. Even though this bodes well for a move to I-AA, total annual gate receipts fluctuate substantially each year. This difference, especially in single game receipts, is primarily due to the alternating home and away football dates with the University of North Dakota and the inconsistent number of annual home and away football games. Regardless of NCAA classification, Athletics should develop a football "scheduling criteria" that reflects the Department's financial goals.
Facilities The Consultants found most of NDSU's Athletic facilities to be in good condition overall, but much improvement and expansion is needed. Primary attention needs to be given to the Bison Sports Arena (BSA). Built in 1970, the BSA has begun to show its age and is physically stressed. It has become over-utilized and space has been carved out of original designated areas to accommodate additional women's sports, required Support Systems and year- around training or practice. The Consultants recommend that Athletics, in concert with the University Master Plan, expeditiously complete plans for the proposed renovation of Bison Sports Arena. Strong consideration should be given to creating indoor training space for sports like softball, baseball, soccer, golf and track. These two improvements are important regardless of NCAA classification.
Personnel The number of Bison coaches (25) is a little lower than the Big Sky's mean of 30. This is noteworthy since the average number of sports sponsored within the Conference is 16.4 and is consistent with NDSU's 16 sports when Track, Outdoor Track and Cross Country are counted as separate sports for meeting Division I requirements. While the number of NDSU's coaches and sports are similar to those in the Big Sky, current data shows that NDSU's average salaries for its head and assistant coaches are considerably lower. To continue at a championship level at either Division II or Division I-AA, a combination of full and part-time positions to adequately staff NDSU's 17 Support Systems along with extra coaches will be needed. All personnel adjustments should be phased in using a prescribed reclassification timeline and all positions should contribute to the Department's organizational design, mission and strategic priorities.
Support Systems Analysis By industry standards, NDSU's collective Division II Support Systems are quite mature and well prepared for a move to I-AA. However, to consistently sponsor a broad-based championship level Division II athletic program, the Consultants do recommend enhancements for most of the seventeen Systems. Enhancements are more extensive for I-AA, especially in the area of additional personnel. The completion of the proposed expansion/renovation of the Bison Sports Arena will have a consequential impact on various Support Systems' ability to effectively provide services required for both Division II and I-AA Athletics. Those Systems most reliant on new facilities include Academic Services, CHAMPS/Life Skills, Equipment Operations, Strength & Conditioning and Video Operations. C. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Consultants' Conclusions and Recommendations were developed from studying the issues and costs related to the reclassification of NDSU Athletics from NCAA Division II to I-AA. These actions will strengthen the continued advancement of NDSU Athletics in the context of the institution's mission, priorities and resources.
COMPREHENSIVE RECOMMENDATIONS North Dakota State University has made great strides in strengthening its programs and in its overall growth. However, with its expanded emphasis on institutional advancement and creative partnerships with its constituents for the future, the University has positioned itself to achieve new levels of excellence and recognition. Therefore, the Consultants conclude that reclassifying Intercollegiate Athletics from Division II to I-AA is consistent with the overall institutional reclassification of the University. The Consultants recommend that the University begin the transition process, but only after it has achieved the following:
Based on North Dakota State University's mission and vision, Carr Sports Associates, Inc. concludes a reclassification to Division I is warranted. If NDSU determines that remaining in Division II Athletics is in its best interest, they recommend there should be strong public statements affirming the continued support for the Athletic Program from all levels of the University's leadership. For more information contact Athletic Director Gene Taylor, 231-8985 | |||