Authors and contributors to departmental or unit reports of the assessment of student learning may wish to review the following items to assure complete presentation of activities: 

• Were the intended student outcomes modified from those used previously?  If so, was an updated "Chart" of intended learning outcomes included?

• Was the report based on the current intended student learning outcomes?

• Are the outcomes identified with the learning objectives of the major?  (Are the outcomes a reflection of the mission statement or strategic plan?)

• Was the evidence used in this report related to the learning outcomes?

• Did the evidence used in this report verify student achievement?

• Was sufficient evidence of student learning presented?  Were valid methods used to collect the evidence of student learning?

• Are the assessment activities described adequately?

• Were the conclusions appropriate for the evidence in the report?

Are the plans to use the results realistic?